Teaching Reading and Writing with Reading Progress, Diffit, and Padlet

Authors

  • Brigette Whaley West Texas A&M University

Keywords:

literacy instruction, Reading Progress, Immersive Reader, Diffit, Padlet, oral reading fluency, writing, formative assessment

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are reshaping literacy teaching by personalizing practice, streamlining feedback, and expanding opportunities for collaborative reading and writing. This is a practitioner-oriented article that is a synthesis of existing literature and examples of classroom practice. The use of three applications, Microsoft Reading Progress (with Immersive Reader), Diffit, and Padlet, is described, used in oral reading fluency, comprehension, vocabulary, written response, and multimodal composition instruction. Microsoft Reading Progress can lower performance anxiety and reduce assessment time, while Diffit enables text adaptation and question generation for diverse readers. Although Padlet is not an AI tool, it complements AI-informed analytics by providing a shared space for visible thinking, peer response, and formative assessment. The discussion situates these practices within a humanizing pedagogy that amplifies student voice and encourages critical literacy, while also addressing equity concerns that include device access, data privacy, teacher preparation, and algorithmic bias. Practical guidance for teachers and school leaders focuses on job-embedded professional learning, clear ethical frameworks, and infrastructure planning. Conclusions based on classroom practices are that the purposeful use of AI can support literacy growth when paired with teacher judgment, equitable access, and strong pedagogical design.

               Keywords: literacy instruction, Microsoft Reading Progress Immersive Reader, Diffit, Padlet, Artificial Intelligence

References

Agrawal, S., & Carpuat, M. (2024). Do text simplification systems preserve meaning? A human evaluation via reading comprehension. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 12(00), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00653

Bartolomé, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.64.2.58q5m5744t325730

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity Press.

Carter Andrews, D. J., Richmond, G., & Floden, R. E. (2018). Teacher education for critical democracy: Understanding our commitments as design challenges and opportunities. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117752363

Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z

Diffit. (2024). Diffit. https://web.diffit.me/

Diliberti, M. K., Schwartz, H. L., Doan, S., Shapiro, A., Rainey, L. R., & Lake, R. J. (2024). Using artificial intelligence tools in K–12 classrooms (RR-A956-21). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA956-21.html

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Herder and Herder.

Hidayat, M. T. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-based personalised reading platforms in enhancing reading comprehension. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.955

International Society for Technology in Education. (2023, July). Bringing AI to school: Tips for school leaders [PDF]. https://cms-live-media.iste.org/Bringing_AI_to_School-2023_07.pdf

Jose, J. (2025). The impact of integrating Microsoft Teams-Reading Progress as an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for promoting learners’ reading-aloud skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 7077–7115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13074-3

Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.

Liu, W. (2024). A systematic review of automated writing evaluation feedback: Validity, effects, and students’ engagement. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 45, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.05

National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Children’s internet access at home (Indicator CCH). The Condition of Education 2023. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cch

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation, and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

Ramadhani, A. S., Dewi, U., Syahnaz, M., & Kihwele, J. E. (2023). The effectiveness of using Padlet in collaborative writing based on students’ perceptions. Child Education Journal, 5(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.33086/cej.v5i1.3767

Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education, 10(3), 610–620. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103044

Ray, S. (2021). Students have a new, less stressful way to improve their reading, and it’s easier for teachers, too. Microsoft News. https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/work-life/reading-progress/

Reyes, G. T. (2006). Finding the poetic high: Building a spoken word poetry community and culture of creative, caring, and critical intellectuals. Multicultural Education, 14(2), 10–15.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf

Waltemeyer, S., Hembree, J. R., & Hammond, H. G. (2021). Padlet: The multipurpose Web 2.0 tool. Journal of Instructional Research, 10, 93–99. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1314149.pdf

Wilson, J., Zhang, F., Palermo, C., Cruz Cordero, T., Myers, M. C., Eacker, H., Potter, A., & Coles, J. (2024). Predictors of middle school students’ perceptions of automated writing evaluation. Computers & Education, 211, 104985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104985

Downloads

Published

2026-03-03